The Truth About Sodium Laurel Sulfate
The Truth About Sodium Laurel Sulfate
Since we began searching for natural products for our daughter about 7 years ago, we've come across all kinds of controversies and misinformation concerning many product ingredients. One of the biggest controversies surrounds Sodium Laurel Sulfate.
For those of you not familiar, sodium laurel (& laureth) or SLS is a surfactant used in shampoos, toothpastes and liquid soaps. You'll often find SLS or its derivatives even in "all natural" products. After all, SLS is derived from a natural source. And, as we have stated in other places, natural is a relative term. Once you combine any two ingredients, one could claim a product is natural or not natural. SLS is derived from coconut. So, some people consider it to be natural. It's just as natural as "grapefruit seed extract".
But, is that really the point? The question we think is relevant is "Is SLS harmful?"
SLS is a foaming and cleaning agent. Its controversy stems from the belief by some that it is highly toxic, highly irritating and carcinogenic. Some people have gone so far as to avoid any product with Sodium Laurel Sulfate or any of its chemical cousins.
Because of our personal concerns for our family and our position in the industry, we have studied this issue, with great interest, and from both sides. We realize that some manufacturers have a stake in promoting the use of SLS and some have a stake (those who make "alternative" products) in villifying it. We don't want to be responsible for hype on either side of this issue. We could offer either or both types of products. Unfortunately, whenever you read anything on the subject, you must take into the consideration the interests of the author.
What will he or she gain if you accept her position? While there are some people who believe SLS is unsafe, there are just as many who point to the fact that it has been used for decades with no proven serious health risks. Here are the facts. SLS, in its pure form, is a skin irritant. But, no one suggests you put pure SLS on your skin hour after hour and leave it there. That's the way irritability tests are performed. Pure SLS is placed on the skin and left for hours.
In that form it is deemed an irritant. However, in health and beauty formulations, SLS is highly diluted by the other ingredients and is usually rinsed off (in the case of shampoos or body washes) or rinsed out- (in the case of toothpastes), minimizing or eliminating the irritating effects. Only those with highly sensitive skin are adversely harmed by the levels of SLS in most products and these effects are usually just mild skin irritations (rash or dry skin).
The Myth In the late 1990s a myth began making its way around the Internet that claimed SLS causes cancer. This email myth spread rapidly and was taken up by manufacturers of alternative products. In searching for the truth about this myth, we could not find one unbiased, credible source to back it up. There is strong evidence that a manufacturer of alternative products started this myth.
But, even without proof of this, what we have found is no one can seem to find a credible source for this belief. Like many Internet email myths it has taken on a life of its own and has shown how if something is repeated often enough, it can become accepted as indisputable truth by those who suddenly hear it from multiple "credible" sources. Our conclusion on SLS is this. It is a potential irritant.
For people with extremely sensitive skin, it is possible they should avoid Sodium Laurel Sulfate. But the studies for skin irritation involve applying pure SLS to the shaved skin of an albino rat, hour after hour with no rinsing. (So, don't do that.) SLS is used so commonly because it is a very good surfactant (agent that helps water be more effective). Products without SLS simply will not foam as well and many people don't like that.
Many people want lots of foam from their shampoos and body washes. SLS is a great way to get that foam. Also, we believe that SLS is potentially drying to African American hair and skin. For that reason, we prefer products that use milder forms of surfactants (like the often confused SLES or Sodium Laureth Sulfate) or products that use SLS in lower concentrations (further down the ingredient list). Most salon grade shampoos (including the ones we offer) use these alternative surfactants.
Our plan is to offer both products with SLS and those that are SLS free. The SLS products tend to clean better, foam better and are usually less expensive. For the vast majority of people, we think they are fine. We use them personally. However, for those who want to avoid SLS (and its cousins) all together, we will continue to offer sulfate free products.
Alternative Surfactants
Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate and Sodium Laureth Sulfate are two alternatives to Sodium Laurel Sulfate. Unfortunately, the controversy over these two compounds is just about as crazy as the controversy over SLS. Some manufacturers have claimed they are milder and safer. Other manufacturers (who by the way have decided not to use them) claim they are even harsher than SLS.Conclusions We'll keep this short.
We have enough research to fill up about 20 pages. But, our job here is to present you with the big picture. What should you do when you hear a rumor about an ingredient? First of all, remain calm. When you hear a report of a dangerous ingredient, consider the source. In fact, first find out the source. If a friend tells you or you get an email, find out where the information originated. Then, do your own research and try to look at both sides. Go to responsible websites like the American Cancer Society and find out what they have to say.
Sodium Laurel
by Carrie A. Corson
Since I became the buyer of personal care products about three years ago, I have been made aware of the Sodium Laurel (& Laureth) controversy. For those of you not familiar, sodium laurel (& laureth) or SLS is a surfactant used in shampoos, toothpastes and liquid soaps (including "all natural" products, as it comes from a natural source). Basically it is a foaming and cleaning agent. Its controversy stems from the belief by some that it is highly toxic, highly irritating and carcinogenic. In their concern over this ingredient, some suggest that the Co-op not carry any products that contain SLS.
I have studied this issue from every side I can think of, talking to chemists, manufacturers and other "in the know" personal care people, and the only thing I know for sure is that there is disagreement on the issue. While there are some people who feel that SLS is unsafe, there are just as many who think that while in pure form it may be somewhat unsafe (mostly as a strong irritant), that it is absolutely safe to use in health and beauty formulations.
In searching for further information I turned to the Internet. I did find articles stating that SLS is highly toxic. I found just as many articles that contradicted that information (sometimes on the same Web site). I took this quote from one such article. "In recent months [this article was published in December 1999] there has been a myth making its way around the net, that sodium laurel sulfate causes cancer. At some level this is probably true. It is also true that if you poke yourself in the eye everyday with a bratwurst, after 20 or 30 years the affected area will become cancerous."
One article I found blamed the natural products industry with starting this "myth" in order to scare people into buying all natural, SLS free products. Another article blamed it on companies who make what they called "grocery store level" shampoos in order to regain business lost to consumers who are buying "salon" quality products in order to avoid some of the potentially dangerous ingredients found in less expensive products. Apparently in some of these shampoos a much less expensive ingredient called ammonium laurel sulfate is used instead of SLS. In the opinion stated in one article, SLS is infinitely safer than ALS. However, as you might guess, I found another article that sung the praises of ALS as being much safer because molecularly it is too large to penetrate skin and it is much less of an irritant.
So the truth is, I don't know what to think about the potential danger of SLS. To me it is similar to the fluoride toothpaste controversy. Many people feel that fluoride is toxic and that we are exposed to way too much of it. However, there are probably just as many (actually probably a lot more) who feel fine about fluoride and are willing to risk possible toxicity in exchange for what they see as the health benefit to teeth. So it comes down to choices. I choose to buy organic products, both food and personal care, whenever possible. I choose to use fluoride free toothpaste. Do I choose to use products that include SLS? The answer is sometimes. I have to admit that I like my toothpaste foamy and until very recently I hadn't found one without SLS that I liked. That has changed since Nature's Gate and Jason have both introduced SLS free toothpastes that are yummy.
Am I willing to discontinue all of the products I carry that contain SLS? The answer is no.
But for those of you who want to avoid it there is good news. I would estimate that about half of the body care products we carry are SLS free. Great products like the Giovanni line of hair care, Weleda toothpastes, Pomega5, Avalon Organics, the Nature's Gate Organic line, Dr. Bronners, Sun Dog, and Jason products, are all SLS free. So, who uses SLS? Tom's of Maine, Earth Science, Kiss My Face, Dessert Essence, Pure and Basic, Nature's Gate, Shikai and King Fisher.
Who uses the fewest "natural" chemical ingredients? Hands down, at least in this store, it's Aubrey Organics. This is the line I recommend for folks who want only the purest products. The company philosophy is "if you can't put it in your mouth, you shouldn't put it on your skin." But cleanliness within a product is not without a price. And consequently Aubrey Organics products are more expensive (significantly in some cases) than other natural products.
Perhaps more and more companies will discontinue using SLS if the controversy over its use continues to build. I don't think that would be a bad thing as long as it is not replaced by something that has more toxicity but we just won't know it. If you are one of those who have been convinced of the health dangers of SLS, make a choice not to buy products that contain it. Your choice can help turn the tide.
http://www.moscowfood.coop/archive/sodium-laurel.html
What is your (BMR) Basic Metabolic Rate. 
